<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collaboration Technology Evals: Process versus Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.enterpriseadvocates.com/2009/11/21/collaboration-technology-evals-process-versus-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.enterpriseadvocates.com/2009/11/21/collaboration-technology-evals-process-versus-practice/</link>
	<description>batting for the enterprise tech buyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:05:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SourcePOV</title>
		<link>http://blog.enterpriseadvocates.com/2009/11/21/collaboration-technology-evals-process-versus-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>SourcePOV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.enterpriseadvocates.com/?p=284#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Great insights, Oliver.  I&#039;m glad you&#039;ve introduced notion of vertical v. horizontal information flows. Those who advocate &#039;networked&#039; style of interactions or an organizational hybrid .. eg., &#039;Heterarchy&#039;: K.Stephenson (2007) .. get at the new complexity in other ways. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, the concept of information flows in more than one direction should get everyone thinking. Context is truly becoming king, as complexity of interactions grows. KM has to play a role.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m intrigued by your use of &#039;Collaboration Technology&#039; as a way to describe social media adoption in Enterprise 2.0, and presumably its cousin, Government 2.0. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you seeing traction with this terminology? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The semantics of  &#039;social media&#039; certainly don&#039;t help in the commercial context. I&#039;m involved in several threads on that as we speak (or should I say, type).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any insights appreciated .. thanks for another great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insights, Oliver.  I&#39;m glad you&#39;ve introduced notion of vertical v. horizontal information flows. Those who advocate &#39;networked&#39; style of interactions or an organizational hybrid .. eg., &#39;Heterarchy&#39;: K.Stephenson (2007) .. get at the new complexity in other ways. </p>
<p>In any case, the concept of information flows in more than one direction should get everyone thinking. Context is truly becoming king, as complexity of interactions grows. KM has to play a role.</p>
<p>I&#39;m intrigued by your use of &#39;Collaboration Technology&#39; as a way to describe social media adoption in Enterprise 2.0, and presumably its cousin, Government 2.0. </p>
<p>Are you seeing traction with this terminology? </p>
<p>The semantics of  &#39;social media&#39; certainly don&#39;t help in the commercial context. I&#39;m involved in several threads on that as we speak (or should I say, type).</p>
<p>Any insights appreciated .. thanks for another great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
